The question of whether military intervention in Syria would do more harm than good is an issue that stretches to a number of nations due to complicated alliances and interests. Also the Syrian regime and the rebels are standing at the end of the line of mediation that diplomacy seems hardly possible. To begin with, Syria’s rebellion is quite different from other ousters in the Arab Spring such as those of Egypt and Libya. The number of deaths caused by the clash between two forces is relatively low. Also Russia, China, and Iran are on the administration’s side while other western nations such as Britain, France, and the United states are trying to mitigate the problem through different methods. Syria is even provided with weaponry from its allies, and these intertwined relationships make it a more difficult issue. Furthermore, the opposing side argues that military intervention widens the range of different ways to resolve the situation. The United Nations does not necessarily have to militarily intervene, but they can simply impose explicit and crystal clear threats to the Syrian regime, which can function more effectively. However, diplomatic methods seem gloomy since the Free Syrian Army wants nothing less than the death of their current dictator.