The question of whether subsidizing renewable energy is a good way to wean the world off fossil fuels comes down to basically 3 clashes. Firstly, each side has to prove whether the situation is imminent or not that we must or must not implement renewable energy plants now. The proposition emphasizes that the world has to reduce its energy consumption by 80% until 2050 while its natural increase is predicted to double. Secondly, if indeed the usage of fossil fuels must come to an end, are we fully capacitated to efficiently produce renewable energy? Or is the global society trying to push solar panels and wind turbines anyway? The opposition’s whole argument mostly consists of analyzing why several types of renewable energy are inefficient, type by type. He also emphasizes that tremendous amount of fossil fuels are required in the process of manufacturing necessary things in order to construct renewable energy plants, and that such conditions which they require is very troublesome for countries that cannot afford or accommodate those renewable energy plants. Lastly, what will be the motive for these companies which produce renewable energy to match the international standards while the demand is too low, which is that same reason why solar panel companies ran out of business?