The question of whether the West should keep out of the
Arab world’s revolutions has to do a lot with international relations and
individual nations’ interests. For the proposition, the main argument is that
the western world is infusing their influence in the Middle East mostly for the
sake of the nation’s own good. The perfect example is the Iraq War, where the
American Army sent thousands of troops to Iraq for similar reasons. The thing
is that the western countries disguise their actions while the true intentions
lie on crude oil and natural resources. A few nations of the western world also
used to be advocates of certain dictators in the Middle East which the
protesters are demonstrating against, and this duplicity degrades the
credibility of these nations once again. On the other hand the opposition
believes that the western nations have by far more experience and knowledge of
the nature of democracy, and thus they have the responsibility to help the
citizens to live in a democratic system. Also the opposition reminisces the
past, where the cooperation of the United Nations which the western countries
mostly took part led to positive results, such as Libyan freedom from Muammar
Qaddafi.
21 May 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
reflection on my in-class response ‘Body Ritual Among the Nacirema’ by Horace Miner is probably the most distinct essay that I ...
-
The Concept of Minjok The concept of Minjok is stronger than the physical borders of Korea . It is the most influential producer...
-
The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer. ...
-
The Security Council, along with the General Assembly, is probably the most influential and eminent Committee above all the other one...
-
Our last assignment for Mr.Menard's class was to write a review about "The Age of Stupid". At first, I was a firm believer of ...
yeah that guy
Powered by Blogger.
0 comments:
Post a Comment