The question of whether the world would be better off without nuclear power is a question that deals with multiple issues such as safety, efficiency, and practicality. Firstly, on the issue of safety the proposition and the opposition have two distinct views. The proposition emphasizes the past experiences including the terrible destruction of Fukushima nuclear power plant that it puts the citizen’s lives to the edge of the cliff. On the other hand, the opposition believes that it is obvious that new born nuclear power plants implement modern nuclear technology, and it has developed rapidly enough to maximize safety and refrain from demonstrating another Fukushima again. The second issue is the efficiency. The great example is china, where only 4% of whole demand of electricity is predicted to be supplied by Nuclear energy in the future. With tremendous investment and such a small return, the proposition believes the world would be better off using fossil fuels and rather emit extra 2 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Lastly, practicality is another issue. The public has a general fear upon Nuclear Energy, and therefore the government loses its legitimacy to exercise such policies of constructing extra Nuclear power plants.